Current Trends and Challenges in Protecting Rights at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) was established to ensure the protection of human rights on the international stage. Since its creation in 1959, it has become the primary mechanism for citizens whose rights have been violated at the national level. However, as political situations evolve and the number of complaints increases, the Court faces new challenges. Modern challenges, such as case overload, political instability, and prolonged decision-making timelines, require the ECHR to continuously adapt and optimize its procedures.

---

Current Problems and Challenges

1. Increase in Complaints

One of the most evident challenges for the ECHR is the sharp increase in the number of complaints. In 2022, over 45,000 new complaints were registered, a 20% increase from the previous year. This significantly increases the burden on the Court and requires more efficient procedures and optimization of its work. The continuous rise in complaints puts pressure on the Court’s resources, which in turn affects the speed at which decisions are made.

---

2. Delays in Case Review

Another major issue is the delay in reviewing cases. On average, it may take from one to several years for a case to be reviewed by the ECHR. For example, in the case of Alekseev v. Russia, the applicant waited for more than five years for a decision. Delays in the process can substantially reduce the effectiveness of rights protection, as some of the issues raised in the complaints may lose their relevance due to the lengthy waiting period.

This situation calls for the ECHR to implement new technologies and approaches to expedite the process. For example, using automated systems for initial complaint filtering or improving cooperation with national courts could help speed up the process.

---

3. Inefficiency of Some Procedures

Another challenge is the need to improve procedural mechanisms. Specifically, lengthy and often convoluted complaint submission processes, the necessity of numerous formalities, and the lack of standardization in dealing with various types of cases can complicate the process. The efficiency of the Court’s work could be enhanced by simplifying some procedures and improving interactions with lawyers and applicants.

---

The Impact of Political Changes

The political situation in Europe has a significant impact on the work of the ECHR. A prominent example is the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union. This move raised questions about the future interaction between the UK and the ECHR. Although the UK remains a member of the European Convention, its exit from the EU has raised concerns about the mechanisms for its interaction with international human rights bodies. This creates uncertainty both for UK citizens and for the Court, which will face new legal and political realities.

At the same time, the potential exit of Russia from the Council of Europe presents another critical challenge for the ECHR. If Russia were to leave the Council, citizens of the country would lose the ability to approach the ECHR for protection of their rights. This would limit access to international protection, which could worsen the human rights situation in the country.

---

Future Interaction of Russia with the ECHR

The scenario of Russia exiting the Council of Europe would jeopardize the ability of its citizens to approach the ECHR, which would have serious consequences for human rights practice in the country. Even though Russia may leave the Council, it would still be required to implement decisions made by the ECHR in cases heard prior to its exit.

Lawyers such as Mark Feygin have already pointed out the need to develop alternative mechanisms for protecting rights on the international stage. In the event that Russian citizens lose access to the ECHR, new ways to provide international human rights protection must be created that can effectively operate within the current political situation.

---

Conclusion

The challenges facing the ECHR require a comprehensive approach. The increase in complaints, delays in case processing, and political changes all create significant challenges for the Court. It is crucial for Council of Europe member states to continue supporting the work of the ECHR and actively collaborate on human rights issues. At the same time, citizens must understand that professional lawyers are essential for effectively utilizing ECHR mechanisms. These experts will assist in filing complaints correctly and presenting them in court.

In the next section, we will explore strategies for successfully defending rights in the ECHR, helping citizens effectively navigate available mechanisms and guarantee justice in the face of current challenges.